People’s power prevailed once again after Chief Minister Pramod Sawant promised leaders of the Mirabag agitation on Monday that he would close the bandhara project file. However, much before that, an eventful Monday exposed deep-rooted issues of trust, transparency, pressure and democratic accountability. It was a day when the government put up a stiff resistance, stalling people from moving to Panaji, and drawing up a calculated plan to scuttle the protest in Panaji.
With heavy police deployed at Azad Maidan to ward off the protesters seeking a written assurance from the government, it was the North Goa Collector’s prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS at Azad Maidan and adjoining areas from March 30 that came as a surprise. It meant that the government had activated its machinery in full force to deflate the agitation before it reached its objective. This move not only reflected the intent but also showed that the government was in no mood to shelve the project.
The imposition of Section 163, which restricts protesters' rights to assemble, is a disturbing precedent because it represents a clear attempt to stifle democratic expression, especially when people have exhausted all other avenues to safeguard community interests. It meant that the government could choose silence over dialogue. Not too long ago, when protestors were seeking withdrawal of zone changes at Siridao by marching to TCP Minister Vishwajit Rane’s Dona Paula residence, the argument was that it was illegal and in bad taste. People were advised that protests could be held at designated areas like Azad Maidan (and not at government offices or residences). It was bizarre that even this legitimate right was being denied to aggrieved citizens.
One of the most glaring questions on Monday’s developments would be why the government did not proactively give a clear assurance earlier, when it could have, and why did it wait for the pressure to pile on? Or, were there some other plans? Why did the CM’s categorical assurance, like the one given on Monday, not come earlier, much before the protest could escalate? Why did the government choose to walk this path and risk such distrust? The very fact that the protestors were only seeking a written assurance amplifies the fact that there is no confidence in the spoken word, just like in the case of the Unity Mall agitation.
The pushback that the government is experiencing lately over environmental concerns, land issues or ecological factors has a common thread, and there are numerous cases of democratic principles being undermined, and political expediency prevailing over community voices.
The Mirabag retreat is yet another victory for the resilient and spirited people of Goa, people who have consistently demonstrated their unwavering commitment to safeguarding their land, environment, and community rights. It is a tribute to those who are driven by a deep sense of responsibility and sheer love for their homeland. It’s an inspiring tribute to those who have been resolutely fighting against projects and policies they believe threaten the land they belong to.
The courage of the people of Mirabag in standing up to powerful interests, their persistence in demanding transparency, and their willingness to confront authority reflect the true spirit of Goanness.
