When restrictions apply to some, not all

The Pramod Sawant-led BJP government imposed Section 163 of the BNSS in Panaji city and nearby areas on Friday, through the District Magistrate of North Goa, citing the need to maintain public order during the two-day visit of BJP National President Nitin Nabin. The order restricted the movement of five or more people in a group.

However, on the same day, BJP leaders and a large number of party workers were seen moving in groups across the city. They took out a rally to welcome their national president, raising slogans and creating a festive atmosphere, which appeared to go against the very order that had been imposed.
This has raised questions about the purpose of enforcing Section 163 in the city. If a large gathering of party workers was planned, the need for such restrictions becomes unclear. The situation has also led to concerns that the order may have affected others who had planned protests in the city on the same day.
The events have created an impression that rules are applied differently, depending on who is involved. This has led to criticism that restrictions meant for maintaining public order should be enforced fairly and equally, without exceptions.