The Supreme Court’s recent judgment on stray dogs has opened a Pandora’s box. The question is whether the government has the infrastructure, manpower, and funds to implement the order—or if a review will be sought.
The menace of strays is undeniable: dog attacks, rabies, and road accidents. Solutions are twofold—eliminate the problem or control the population through sterilization. Animal rights advocates must also share responsibility. Occasional feeding without adoption or long-term plans only worsens the issue. Abandonment by negligent owners adds directly to the crisis, with packs of strays turning aggressive in their search for food.
Pet dogs of aggressive breeds are regulated, and owners held accountable. Why then are strays left unchecked? The government has spent heavily on Gaushalas for cows, though their effectiveness is debatable. A similar model is needed for strays. Shelters must be created and supported, as NGOs lack resources to manage alone.
The Supreme Court’s recommendations deserve serious action. A system of shelters, backed by government and public cooperation, can balance compassion with responsibility and bring lasting solutions.
