MAPUSA
In a resounding victory for community activism, the residents of Assagao have successfully forced the shutdown of the controversial nightclub in a residential area in the village following weeks of sustained protests, public mobilization and official representations.
The proponents of the alleged nightclub ‘Rumba’, operated by M/s DNG Entertainment, have now dismantled the interior setup of the venue and indicated a complete withdrawal from the location.
The decision to wind up operations marks the culmination of a persistent grassroots movement led by the Assagao-Badem Citizens Action Committee (ABCAC), which galvanised villagers and pressured local authorities to act.
The issue began gaining traction after concerns were raised about the club’s location in a quiet, predominantly residential area.
“It’s the power of the villagers who stood united and fought tooth and nail with the intent that they would not give up until the nightclub was shut down. The local panchayat backed our cause, which tilted the balance in our favour,” said ABCAC Convenor Surendra Gad
According to sources, the dismantling of the club’s interior infrastructure has already been completed. Only the outer shell of the building now remains.
Assagao Sarpanch Hanumant Naik confirmed the development, stating, “They have removed all the equipment and gadgets set up inside the premises, which indicates that they have decided to withdraw from Assagao.”
Despite the visible signs of withdrawal, the matter is still pending adjudication before the Chief Town Planner (CTP). A hearing is scheduled for June 12.
“The legal process is still underway, but what’s happening on the ground clearly suggests that they have chosen to close shop,” added Naik.
The villagers’ campaign combined traditional protest methods with formal channels of engagement.
Residents staged candlelight marches, submitted representations to government departments, and personally met with Chief Minister Pramod Sawant and Town and Country Planning (TCP) Minister Vishwajit Rane to voice their objections.
Their concerns centered round the disruptive potential of a nightclub in a serene village known for its heritage homes and tourism-friendly environment. ABCAC argued that such an establishment would bring noise pollution, traffic congestion and an unwelcome change in the village’s cultural fabric.
Initially, the local panchayat appeared non-committal, reportedly dragging its feet over the permissions granted to the nightclub. However, following increasing public pressure, it eventually aligned with the villagers’ stance.
