FRIDAY, 4 SEPTEMBER 2026
Ticker

'Pandora's Box' in FBI Apple case

An FBI demand that Apple unlock an iPhone risks setting a dangerous precedent that could have a chilling effect on human rights, the United Nations rights chief warned. "In order to address a security-related issue related to encryption in one case, the authorities risk unlocking a Pandora's Box that could have extremely damaging implications for the human rights of many millions of people, including their physical and financial security," Zeid said in a statement. He warned that the FBI order would "set a precedent that may make it impossible for Apple or any other major international IT company to safeguard their clients' privacy anywhere in the world".

The FBI wants to unlocked the iPhone used by Syed Farook, who was behind the San Bernardino massacre along with his wife Tashfeen Malik that left 14 people dead. The agency has argued that by introducing encryption that can lock data, making it accessible only to the user, Apple and other tech companies are essentially creating "warrant-proof zones" for criminals and others that will cripple law enforcement and jeopardise public security. Apple has in return said that the only way to unlock the handset would be to introduce a weakened operating system, which could potentially leak out and be exploited by hackers and foreign governments.

Zeid said encryption tools were widely used around the world, including by human rights defenders, civil society, journalists, whistle-blowers and political dissidents facing persecution and harassment. "Encryption and anonymity are needed as enablers of both freedom of expression and opinion, and the right to privacy. Without encryption tools, lives may be endangered."

Three tech associations representing Apple's main business rivals -- including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Yahoo -- said that they supported Apple's efforts to challenge the order. But relatives of some of the San Bernardino victims backed the FBI bid in a legal brief filed in the court where the case is being heard.

SHARE ON

Defending the flag

In the midst of all these recent debate, it’s important to realise that India has never had a single dominant nationalism “ and it won’t any time soon

Amalendu Misra
Published Mar 5, 2016, 12:00 AM IST
SHARE ON
Defending the flag

Ever since the Narendra Modi lef Bharatiya Janata Party came to power, plenty of ink and pixels have been spent trying to explain the ascendancy of Hindu nationalism in India. But while the BJP’s concept of “Hindutva” has sparked angry protests across the country, most recently at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi that continued for weeks before Kanhaiya Kumar was let out on bail recently, there are plenty of other Indian nationalisms out there “ and none has ever had a…

READ MORE

Keep Reading — More from EDITORIAL

3 more related stories queued · tap to continue reading

Home HOME News GOA NEWS Global GLOBAL GOENKAR Search SEARCH