The BJP had made scathing criticism of the erstwhile UPA rule when India witnessed terrorist attacks like for example the Mumbai attacks. The BJP (when in opposition ) also publicly assured Indians that such attacks would cease with its governance. However Pahalgam and other attacks during BJP rule proved such BJP claims are unreliable. Granted terror attacks must be condemned and can happen despite the most toughest measures that are taken by the government; however the questions to the BJP are: If the UPA could be criticized then why not NDA? With a large chunk of Indian Army stationed and thousands of crores of taxpayers money spent in Kashmir, should detail investigations not be done to prevent potential future attacks? Yes taking action on the terrorist entities/countries are fine but action should also be addressed internally. Indian politicians and government machinery are not immune from criticism or investigation.
