SUNDAY, 6 SEPTEMBER 2026

Discovering more to life

There is a modern, molecular hunt for the world’s biodiversity. This hunt is advantageous, especially in teaching us more about life’s various mysteries

Discovering more to life
Captured by : EDIT main

The news is full of announcements about newly discovered forms of life. Recently, we learned of a 30,000-year-old giant virus found in frozen Siberia. Until now, known viruses have contained so little genetic information that people have questioned whether they can even be thought of as living. But giant viruses like this one contain as much information as many bacteria, which are certainly alive, and are so big they can be seen with an ordinary microscope.

Earlier this year, we heard that deep in the ocean, by the boiling hot sulfurous vent called Loki’s Castle after the Norse god, a species called Lokiarchaeota was discovered. It uniquely straddles the three domains of life: Eukaryota, including animals and plants; Bacteria; and Archaea, a domain that includes species pumping out methane in your gut right now.

Not only are new life forms being discovered, but so are entirely new ways of living. In the last week we learned of rich communities of bacteria that communicate with each other electrically, in the same ways as the neurons in our brain. The way researchers made these three discoveries illustrates how much the modern study of biodiversity has changed in the last 200 years. Until 1977, we had no idea the ocean floor was home to life at all, never mind rich communities including Lokiarchaeota.

But what’s amazing about the discovery of Lokiarchaeota is that no one has ever actually seen it. Everything we know about it is discovered by the new field of metagenomics, which allows us to extract fragments of DNA from the environment, read the sequence information and study it with computational techniques. Ultimately these genetic profiles are known to us only as an electronic string of 1’s and 0’s in computer memory and described to us by mathematical algorithms. Such molecular and computer technologies are also how modern detectives “use DNA” to catch murderers.

First, we find some DNA in the environment that may be of interest to us, by fishing for it with molecular probes called primers. Then we can use the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to make a huge number of copies of the DNA of interest. That allows machines to read the genetic information it contains directly into computer databases. These digital databases are where biodiversity information is now stored.

Anyone who watches crime shows knows well the detective value of such databases in identifying criminals by allowing the comparison of enormous quantities of information. It’s the same for biodiversity study. For example, a new species of elephant was recently discovered using these techniques to analyze and compare the DNA of living elephants and even DNA extracted from museum specimens of the extinct mammoth. We now know that African elephants that live in the forests are as genetically different from those on the savanna as humans are from chimpanzees.

Eschericia coli “ perhaps the most famous microbial species of all “ provides an example of how the idea of “species” itself is on its way to extinction. Look at one genome of E coli and you will find that more than half the genes may or may not be found in some other E coli. Looking at the sequences, many isolates of the food-poisoning bacteria Shigella look more like E coli and vice versa.

So these days questions of molecular diversity arise, not questions about species number. How and why does gene content change, not just in microbes like E coli but in us as well: we have about 20,000 genes and have recently discovered that at least 200 of them may be dispensable, given that perfectly healthy people do not have them at all. One entire domain of life, the Archaea, has not a single example of a “species” causing disease in anything “ why?

What do we gain by studying biodiversity?

We study biodiversity for two reasons that go hand in hand. First, of course, we value scientific knowledge for its own sake. Remarkable discoveries in pure knowledge abound. We now know that an organism discovered so recently that most people have still never heard of it, Prochlorococcus, produces 20% of the world’s oxygen. That’s one in every five breaths you take! The research spotlight has recently focused on the biodiversity of your gut, an ecosystem at least as complex and interesting as the tropical forest. Secondly, this knowledge lets us lay claim to the natural world and exploit our knowledge of it.

People have a long history of exploiting the knowledge that comes from basic research. For instance, the molecular detective work that identified HIV as the cause of AIDS has enabled us to turn a dreadful fatal disease into a chronic, manageable affliction. The commercial potential in Archaea is famous and almost unbelievable, as batteries or optical computer memory, for example.

New forms of life continue to turn up. Most viruses, like HIV and influenza, have about 10 genes. Giant viruses, only discovered in the last decade, have over 1,000, the same order of magnitude as Prochlorococcus. The huge Pandoravirus is full of genes that are unlike anything known “ hence the name “ prompting the question whether they’re a fourth domain of life.

As the hunt for biodiversity gets ever more technical and specific, get ready for a continuing stream of radical new discoveries. As Hamlet said: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

Sean Nee is a research professor of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, USA. This story first appeared on theconversation.com

SHARE ON

Politics of loss

Published Oct 30, 2015, 12:00 AM IST
SHARE ON

New Delhi's tactics to force Nepal to change its Constitution seems to have backfired. India was the sole supplier of fuel to the land-locked country, until Wednesday when the Nepal Oil Corporation inked a deal with China National United Fuel Corporation for supply of fuel. New Delhi claimed that truckers were reluctant to drive through areas where the Madhesi community was protesting against the new Constitution. The community has close cultural links with the neighbouring…

READ MORE

Keep Reading — More from EDITORIAL

3 more related stories queued · tap to continue reading

Home HOME News GOA NEWS Global GLOBAL GOENKAR Search SEARCH