Why is it so difficult for the State government to find full-time presidents for the north and south Goa consumer disputes redressal forums? The government had appointed part-time presidents for the posts, but this did not find favour with the high court. The court noted that the practice of appointing part-time members had undermined the objectives of the Consumer Protection Act. Despite recommendations, the government has not shown any urgency in making the appointments as a result of which consumers were placed at a disadvantage. The system for redressal is important as it provides a level playing field for consumers and companies. One of the charges made in the petition was that the number of adjournments had increased while the number of disposals had reduced. The matter of appointment of judicial officers is crucial to delivery of justice and a delay in making such appointments is equivalent to justice denied. The high court order comes at a time when the government is on the way out. Although an appointment even at this stage would be welcomed, one wonders if it would be appropriate. It would be best if this decision is left to the new government, the combination of which will be revealed on March 11 when votes are counted.
