The controversy surrounding the Election Commission in recent times was avoidable. The manner in which certain decisions have been taken has raised serious questions about the credibility and independence of an institution central to Indian democracy. There is no dispute that electoral rolls require periodic revision and that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) may be necessary. However, such an exercise must be transparent, inclusive and conducted with adequate safeguards to ensure that genuine voters are not unfairly excluded. It must also not appear rushed or driven by electoral considerations. Concerns have been raised about the functioning of the Commission under Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, particularly regarding centralisation and the lack of adequate consultation. Even the perception of such practices can undermine public confidence in the electoral process. The Election Commission once commanded widespread respect for its independence and impartiality. That credibility must be protected regardless of which political party is in power. The Commission must therefore take concrete steps to restore public trust. Elections are meaningful only when voters have confidence that electoral rolls are accurate and that the institution conducting the process is impartial, transparent and independent.
S KAMAT, Mysuru
