The Supreme Court’s decision to examine decisions of the Election Commission (EC) and annul those found contrary to law is a welcome step. The Court has also issued notices to the Centre and the poll panel over allegations that several decisions were taken without the approval of both commissioners. Its clarification that it has not approved any modification to Form 6 used during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls is equally significant. This raises serious questions about the functioning of the Election Commission and the role of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. If the Election Commission is truly an independent constitutional body, why are BJP leaders, including Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant, repeatedly seen defending the CEC? Should not the Election Commission and its chief be able to explain and defend their decisions independently? Voters across India are increasingly questioning the relationship between the EC and the ruling BJP. Allegations that the poll panel has acted contrary to constitutional principles must be investigated thoroughly and transparently at the earliest. The Supreme Court must ensure that the independence and credibility of the Election Commission are protected to safeguard India’s democracy.
JERRY FERNANDES, Saligao
