Many influential voices in India have remained conspicuously quiet during a period of profound political and social change. Their silence has prompted questions about whether it reflects agreement, caution, or fear of potential consequences. There is a widespread perception among some sections of the public that speaking critically of those in power can invite scrutiny from investigative agencies, regulatory action, or other forms of pressure. Whether justified or not, this perception may discourage prominent individuals, business leaders, and public figures from expressing dissent openly. Similarly, concerns have been raised about the concentration of economic power and the belief that businesses seen as challenging the establishment could face increased difficulties. A healthy democracy depends on the freedom to express differing opinions without fear of retaliation. When influential citizens choose silence, regardless of their reasons, the burden of speaking up often falls on ordinary people and younger generations. If India is to remain a vibrant democracy, it is essential that citizens of every generation feel able to participate in public discourse without intimidation. Open dialogue, accountability, and respect for differing viewpoints are the foundations of a strong nation.
REKHA SARIN, Benaulim
