WEDNESDAY, 26 AUGUST 2026
Ticker

'Relationship' dynamics

A healthy relationship involves two people who respect each other, communicate effectively, and share equal rights, responsibilities and opportunities

'Relationship' dynamics

Youngsters these days are increasingly open, direct, and frank about their ‘relationship’ statuses.

Is it the flexibility and personal and intimate nature of a relationship that makes it deeply alluring, resilient and satisfying?

Or is it a trend which if not adopted would leave one an outcast in the modern-day society characterized by a complex mix of rapid technological advancement, shifting social structures, and enduring traditional contradictions!

Anyway, it can’t be denied that there are quite many who prioritize active, self-chosen relationships.  Yet it is surprising to note that relationships do not automatically lead to marriage, as their success depends on aligned intentions, shared values and mutual commitment. While many relationships are for companionship or personal growth, only some culminate in marriage due to factors like compatibility, timing, and readiness.  

I am flummoxed; bemused by the way the simple word ‘relationship’ has meandered through centuries, evolving from a cold, administrative, or logical term to a highly charged, intimate, and emotional one.

The etymology of ‘relationship’ is indeed fascinating as it combines ancient roots regarding communication, bringing things back with a much later, pragmatic, Germanic suffix to describe the ‘state’ of being connected.

‘Relation’ in the 14th century referred to a report, a story, or a connection between things or concepts, which by the early 16th century had begun to be used to describe a person related by blood or marriage “ essentially a relative.

The word ‘relationship’ appeared early in the 18th century, which was initially used to define the formal ‘state of being related’ by kinship or alliance. It was a technical description and not an emotional one.

The 20th century saw a psychological shift where people used this term to define their social bonds. A pivotal change occurred in the 1940s and 1950s, when ‘relationship’ began to be specifically applied to romantic or sexual intimacy.  

By the 1970s and beyond, the term became ubiquitous for all types of intimate pairings, and the recognition of non-traditional couplings made ‘partner’ the standard term for these types of intimate bonds.

Its journey reflects shifting societal values, moving from formal connections to individualized, emotional and romantic bonds.

It is however relevant to note that the evolution of technology acts as a powerful catalyst for language change, driving rapid shifts in vocabulary, idioms, and communication styles.

As new innovations emerge, we learn that language adapts to describe them, often accelerating the creation of new words and reshaping the meaning of existing ones. Needless to say, as technology continues to advance, the words we choose today will pave the way for new expressions, ensuring language remains a living, adapting entity.  

Has the term ‘relationship’ been a technological derivative!

Yes, it would seem considering the fact that it has been deeply recoded, monitored, and modified by the technological ‘matrix’ in which modern life exists.

But let us accept the fact that relationships are being increasingly viewed as the defining, central, and evolving paradigm of modern life, shifting away from rigid, traditional structures toward more personalized, conscious, and flexible models.

Modern relationship paradigms are less about fulfilling predetermined social roles and more about mutual growth, emotional authenticity, and shared values.

My young friend however holds quite a ‘contrasting’ opinion! Despite being in a ‘proper’ relationship for well over a decade, she suddenly finds herself at a crossroads today, devastated and unsure about her future. Slipping into depression, she even had to seek counselling.

Forced to reconstruct her life, identity, and emotional wellbeing on her own, she nevertheless comes across as a strong-willed woman determined to get her priorities right.

This prompted me to delve a bit deeper and understand the fundamentals of a relationship only to realize that while the ‘falling’ in love’ phase feels spontaneous, building a lasting, healthy partnership is an intentional daily effort.   

The transition from the initial spark of romance to a stable, enduring, and fulfilling connection involves moving from intensity to intimacy, and from infatuation to conscious commitment.

Sociologists describe modern relationships as often based on ‘confluent love’ which lasts as long as both partners feel they are gaining personal, emotional, and mental benefits.

A healthy relationship generally involves two people who respect each other, communicate effectively, and share equal rights, responsibilities and opportunities. It often involves interdependence, where partners influence each other calling for mutual support and understanding.

Maintaining a positive relationship in the modern era, despite high expectations for both emotional and physical closeness, requires some real efforts. While intimacy is central to modern, often egalitarian relationships, success hinges on active cultivation rather than passive, ‘happily ever after’ expectations.

Moving beyond logistics to share emotions and vulnerabilities is crucial. This entails listening to understand, rather than to respond, and managing disagreements constructively without resorting to contempt.

A ‘manipulative’ partner destroys a relationship by systematically eroding trust, autonomy, and emotional safety through tactics like gaslighting, isolation, and love-bombing.

This creates a high-conflict or emotionally draining environment where the victim feels trapped, walks on eggshells, and experiences severe anxiety or depression.

A person who professes unwavering love while simultaneously cutting their partner off from friends, family, and support systems is engaging in a classic, often subtle, tactic of coercive control and emotional abuse.

How ‘toxic’ can such relationships be.

I came across an article which states that relationships end not because of a lack of love but because of a lack of connection. Disconnection, left unaddressed, quietly grows overtime.

But more importantly it is commitment without which relationships face instability. It is the foundational, long-term dedication to a partner that builds trust, security, and emotional safety, allowing relationships to thrive through challenges.

I am yet to come to terms with the fundas of modern-day ‘relationships’!

SHARE ON

India risks remaining data mine in age of AI

India does not need to dominate the global AI landscape but it must avoid becoming structurally dependent on technologies it does not shape or control

NAVEEN A
Published Feb 6, 2026, 7:15 PM IST
SHARE ON
India risks remaining data mine in age of AI

Artificial intelligence is no longer merely a technological advance; it is fast becoming a form of public infrastructure. The ability to build, deploy, and govern AI systems will increasingly shape how states deliver services, regulate markets, manage resources, and protect citizens’ rights. From healthcare diagnostics and climate modelling to welfare delivery and urban planning, AI is being embedded into the everyday machinery of governance. In this sense, AI is not just a…

READ MORE
Home HOME News GOA NEWS Global GLOBAL GOENKAR Search SEARCH