As the United States marks its 250th anniversary, the celebrations are understandably filled with references to liberty, democracy and the pursuit of peace. Yet, anniversaries are also moments for reflection, and recent years present a far more complicated picture than the festivities suggest. The US continues to portray itself as a defender of international order while remaining deeply involved in conflicts that have destabilised entire regions.
Whether through direct military interventions, arms supplies or unwavering support for allies engaged in prolonged wars, Washington has often been accused of prioritising strategic interests over humanitarian concerns. Civilian casualties, displacement and long-term instability have become recurring consequences of these policies.Critics argue that America’s commitment to democracy appears selective, championing international law when convenient while overlooking violations when they involve close partners. This perceived inconsistency has weakened its moral authority and fuelled accusations of double standards across much of the world. The United States has undeniably contributed to scientific progress, innovation and global economic development.
However, true leadership is measured not only by economic or military strength but also by consistency in upholding the principles it advocates.
A 250th anniversary should be more than a celebration of past achievements. It should also serve as an opportunity for honest self-examination.
If the United States genuinely wishes to lead by example, it must demonstrate that peace, diplomacy and respect for international law are not merely ideals reserved for speeches but principles applied equally in practice.
Shailesh Shriram Tanpure, Porvorim
