MAPUSA
A Candolim resident has approached the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the village panchayat’s tender for the pay parking contract, alleging bias and an attempt to favour select individuals.
In his petition, Agnelo Sequeiro has contended that the terms and conditions of the tender are “arbitrary and discriminatory,” particularly the eligibility criterion mandating a minimum of two years’ prior experience.
He argued that this requirement has effectively excluded several prospective bidders, including local residents, who would otherwise have participated in the process.
Sequeiro further claimed that the restrictive clause has drastically reduced competition, defeating the very purpose of a public tender, which is to ensure transparency and maximise participation.
He also pointed out that the base bid amount has been reduced compared to last year, which, he argued, could result in financial losses to the panchayat.
The petition highlights multiple procedural concerns, including the delayed issuance of tender forms, an intervening holiday and a shortened submission timeline.
According to the petitioner, these factors, combined with the contested eligibility condition, created an uneven playing field and prevented genuine and capable bidders from taking part.
Calling the criteria “manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution,” Sequeiro has urged the court to intervene, stating that the tender process is structured in a manner that undermines fairness and equal opportunity.
Pay parking contracts in coastal villages like Candolim are considered lucrative, especially during peak tourist seasons, often drawing significant local interest and scrutiny.
The High Court is scheduled to hear the matter on April 15.
